Nicole Nohemi Mauthe
Verified expert@nicole-nohemi-mauthe
@nicole-nohemi-mauthe
"The potential upsides of advanced AI are enormous, but there’s no guarantee they’ll be distributed optimally. In this talk, Cullen O’Keefe, a researcher at the Center for the Governance of AI, discusses one way we could work toward equitable distribution of AI’s benefits — the Windfall Clause, a commitment by AI firms to share a significant portion of their future profits — as well as the legal validity of such a policy and some of the challenges to implementing it." [EA Forum post](https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/eCihFiTmg748Mnoac/cullen-o-keefe-the-windfall-clause-sharing-the-benefits-of), [Youtube video](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFDL-NxY610&ab_channel=CentreforEffectiveAltruism0, [FHI Report overview](https://www.fhi.ox.ac.uk/windfallclause/), [Full report](https://www.fhi.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/Windfall-Clause-Report.pdf).
Here we are
- The 80,000 hours to get mid-level career people involved. - Outreach, talent headhunting, career advice, write materials about how to switch careers or do the most good in a particular career, etc. - Which demographics make most sense? - Which career areas make most sense? - Would targeting EA's parents make sense? - etc.
We are significantly bottlenecked by people doing AI safety research. What if we made an outreach org to get people who have experience as ML engineers into AI alignment? It could do outreach over various methods, such as having booths at conferences, giving lectures to ML grad students, targeted ads online, content marketing, etc. It could provide explanations of the rationale, one-on-one coaching to find a good research path and get into the industry, provide introductory materials, etc.